From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This user account is a bot operated by Cobi (talk). It is a legitimate alternative account, used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually.
Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it . |
|
ClueBot  |
| (talk · contribs) |
ClueBot aids in Operation Enduring Encyclopedia. |
| Operator: |
Cobi (t) |
| Approved? |
Yes, BRFA. |
| Flagged? |
Yes. |
| Task/s: |
Reverting vandalism.[1]
Report IP vandals who use open proxies to WP:OP.[2] |
| Edit rate: |
As fast as it finds vandalism. |
| Edit period/s: |
Continually |
| Automatic or manual? |
Automatic |
| Programming language/s: |
PHP, my own code utilizing api.php, query.php, and index.php. |
| Exclusion compliant? |
Yes |
| Other information: |
ClueBot is run from the ClueNet servers. |
Documentation
Administrator emergency shutoff
Administrators may turn the bot off by changing this page to 'False'.
Exclusion compliant
This bot is an exclusion compliant bot.
Other namespace opt-in
Normally ClueBot will not revert pages outside of the main namespace (with the exception of talk pages if it detects page-move vandalism). However, if there is a good reason to list another page (like a user page, user talk, or talk page that gets vandalized often), it can be listed on this list of pages outside the main namespace to revert.
1RR compliant
This bot will not revert the same article and user more than once per day. There is one exception: This bot will revert today's featured article or any page listed in the opt-in list for angry mode as many times as it finds vandalism. The bot will not revert to itself or one of its friends (MartinBot/VoABot II).
My stats
For my editing stats, please go here.
Scoring system
For pages which have had a lot of text added in the last change, the bot will score the additions based on this list, and then score the removals on the inverse of that list. If the overall score is greater than -100, the bot sees the edit as constructive and does nothing, if it scores less than -100, the bot sees it as destructive, reports it and possibly reverts it.
Open proxy scanning
ClueBot will report open proxies found on vandalizing IP addresses to WP:OP. ClueBot checks the following DNS Blacklists:
ClueBot also scans the following ports for open proxies:
- HTTP: 80 8080 3128 6588 81 8000 8001 8081 808 6660 6661 6662 6663 6664 6665 6666 6667 6668 6669 1337 31337 1338 31338 7000
- SOCKS4: 1080 3128 4914 6826 7198 7366 9036 29992 38884 18844 17771 31121 6660 6661 6662 6663 6664 6665 6666 6667 6668 6669 1337 31337 1338 31338 7000
- SOCKS5: 1080 3128 4438 5104 5113 5262 5634 6552 6561 7464 7810 8130 8148 8520 8814 9100 9186 9447 9578 6660 6661 6662 6663 6664 6665 6666 6667 6668 6669 1337 31337 1338 31338 7000
- ROUTER: 23
- WINGATE: 23
- HTTPPOST: 80 81 808 6588 4480 8000 8001 8080 8081 6660 6661 6662 6663 6664 6665 6666 6667 6668 6669 1337 31337 1338 31338 7000
IRC
Debug channel
ClueBot reports vandalism that it finds in #wikipedia-VAN on FreeNode.
Admin requests
ClueBot will make requests for administrators in #cvn-wp-en when a user vandalizes while listed on AIV. ClueBot also will make requests for administrators in #cvn-wp-en when a page has been vandalized 30 times in the last 48 hours.
Commands
ClueBot responds to a couple of commands due to Wikihermit's request.
!edit [[PAGENAME]] will give information on the last edit to the given page.
!stalk [[User:USERNAME]] will give information on the last edit by the given user.
!count [[User:USERNAME]] will give the edit count for the given user
!beaten [[User:USERNAME]] will give the number of times the given user has beaten ClueBot to a revert
!vandalcount [[PAGENAME]] will give the vandalized count.
!warninglevel [[User:USERNAME]] will give the user warning level during the last two days.
Channels
ClueBot hangs out on the following channels on FreeNode:
Awards
Show all awards
 |
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| After having you beat me to vandalism at least 15 times, you deserve this...you're fantaboulastic! Nolelover (talk) 03:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For simply being the best bot in WikiHistory. How would Wikipedia be without you? ALL HAIL CLUEBOT! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC) |
 |
|
What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar |
| Cluebot = Brilliant!!! Kiddo27 (talk) 17:06, 21 April 2010 (UTC) |
 |
|
CVU Anti-Vandalism Award |
| ClueBot is simply awesome at counter-vandalism (it does half our work for us). Seriously it deserves a lot of praise. Deagle_AP (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For all your hard work reverting vandalism on Wikipedia. There's many a time I've gone to revert vandalism only to be beaten to it by Cluebot! 5 albert square (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| You seem to be able to enlighten Wikipedia in seconds. Thank you for clearing up articles. Please send a CGI message to your programmer through the HTTP protocol to tell him he done a good job. --TheGrimReaper 13:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Greatest anti-vandalism Bot. You deserve this.--Garbolia (talk) 21:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| This is the only warning you will receive for beating all of us. Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia with such vigor, as you did to Robert Earnshaw[1], you will indirectly block others from editing. December21st2012Freak (talk • contribs) 23:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC) |
This editor is a
Most Pluperfect Labutnum and is entitled to display this
Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain, Cigarette Burn, Chewed Broken Pencil, Sticky Note, and Bookmark.
Congrats ClueBot! This is long overdue! Sephiroth storm (talk) 01:29, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| You're really too fast at reverting vandalism... It is slightly frustrating : how am I supposed to compete with a bot ? XTBoris say something ! 09:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| You know, ClueBot, you bring Wikipedia to its heart by reverting BILLIONS of vandalism, so you (and Cobi) may have this barnstar! But, can't you take another 3-day-some break? The last one was about a month ago. I don't want to be beaten all the time. It's like you're the ultimate and greatest anti-vandalism program. :) SchfiftyThree 01:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| To a fantastic bot! R27smith200245 (talk) - methecooldude (ClueNet) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For high-speed move reversals and drawing attention to a certain page-move vandal, I hereby award you this colorful barnstar. Grandmasterka 07:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Stop beating everybody to everything! — The Final Chronicler (talk) 05:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| This is the only warning you will receive for beating all of us. Please stop. If you continue to edit Wikipedia with such vigor, as you did to Burn[2], you will indirectly block others from editing. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 04:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
 |
The Atlas Award |
| ClueBot, thanks for all your speedy work in reverting vandalism! -- Quantockgoblin (talk) 19:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
The Atlas Award - for being a great supporter of Wikipedia
|
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Man, you're REALLY fast! I had to give you this! Barkjon 14:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For irritatingly quick reverting of vandalism! CycloneNimrod (talk? please?) 20:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Why do you have to be so fast? Every time I see vandalism, it's gone by the time I hit revert! Torchflame (talk) 23:51, 2 March 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Why do you have to be so fast? Alexfusco5 12:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| For repeatedly beating me (and everyone else) to vandalism, and because I'm not creative enough to think of a different Barnstar. :) --Thinboy00 talk/contribs @74, i.e. 00:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
 |
|
The da Vinci Barnstar |
| Oh my...how did we survive without this? With MartinBot! Ha, just kidding, but nice work! You've inspired me to even learn PHP (not bots yet, but there is that svg maker... I do use ClueBot III too! Best bots ever! If I was a developer on the HRWiki, I'd try to bring it there. I know this was a long barnstar message, but this is just scratching the surface! Vandals don't stand a chance! Almighty bots! Soxred93 | talk bot 21:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC) |
- So if SineBot gets a cat for recognition, I suppose you get this image on the right. mechamind90 00:02, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
The hunter bot says "something's not right". Ah ha!
- Saw some vandalism on a Ghandi page. Few moments afterwards, I try to revert it back and ClueBot beats me to it. Excellent! --Ryou Concord 23:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
-
- I think you mean Gandhi ! Please be careful about spelling -- Jon Ascton (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- praise to whoever made it --DerekvG (talk) 21:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Damn ClueBot is fast. I wasn't even able to see my vandalism. It was reverted before the page loaded after I clicked save. 99.159.102.109 (talk) 05:16, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
- ClueBot is my hero! I have never seen ClueBot make a mistake. Kevinmon•talk•trib 20:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Cluebot. I just want to say thank you for always fixing vandalism on articles. TuneyLoon 08:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- ...you know when I said that this bot was the best thing in the world? I lied. (you keep @#$% BEATING me!)DaL33T (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks you very much ClueBot. you are so awesome. Thank you for stopping Vandalism!!!--Garbolia (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, you are GOOD. How do you do that? I'm amazed... Airplaneman (talk) 14:45, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
- thanks for the very quick revert of full article content deletion of GIMP --Gnepets (talk) 13:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- If it wasn't for people like ClueBot I would be disappointed at Wikipedia and I would probably be sad. And Wikipedia would be ignored by me as a source of knowledge! THX ClueBot :D:D:D:D:D:D:D!!! From User:jaydenillman (Sorry I forgot)
- Thank you! I screwed up and accidently edited the wrong page. I was trying to add a link someone keeps removing from the Lakota Sioux pages. And am not very good at wikipedia. So thanks for fixing my goof! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnwcreations (talk • contribs) 19:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Today, ClueBot reverted almost instantly a case of vandalism to the school violence entry, an entry I had been working hard to improve. Thank you.Iss246 (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- You saved page Lysosomes from minor vandalism. Nice one! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.215.158 (talk) 08:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your correction, Cluebot, but I never edited the page you said I did. I'm glad you changed it back though :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.227.254 (talk) 00:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Great Job Cluebot! Keep up the great work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.73.219 (talk) 21:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Nice Job! I would say more but your a bot so...Really good job! Venomclaw (talk) 13:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- ClueBot, you're doing a hell of a job out there. MelicansMatkin (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks ClueBot.Im new to Wikipedia, Sorry I didn't know that there should be just one link in the redirect page. I thought we can add more links to the redirect page. Thanks once again for the correction. Oohills123 11 April 2009.
- Thanks. I didn't exactly know what I was doing with that redirect. CheatLemur (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- great job man!!I tried to change the page with some words and want to remove them to prevent any disturbance in the article. Cluebot actually did remove it faster than me!* —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.232.235 (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
- its crazy! every time i go and vandalize my schools wiki your always right there! nice bot man! LankyKid —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertHackney (talk • contribs) 21:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- wow, cluebot beat me to it on the agriculture page. After logging in, the bit of silly vandalism [year 8 high school humour] had already vanished. Amazing. Dirk Enneking —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirk.Enneking (talk • contribs) 03:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Cluebot is faster than a speeding vandal, more powerful than a jedi sockfarm, and quite the looker if I do say so myself. ;3 PumeleonT 12:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Somehow I searched George W. Bush and got a page about a porn director. I refreshed the page less than thirty seconds later and ClueBot had reverted it. Awesome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.49.93.252 (talk) 06:01, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Dear Cluebot, you are so awesome. Thankyou for stopping Vandalism!!!!!!!!!!! --ROBO tron1 (talk) 07:35, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dammit Cobi, you're a genius! You ought to make TWO ClueBots! THREE, if possible! Or at least give me the source code...DaL33T (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dear ClueBot, Thank you for dealing with the attempt on July 14 2008 to vandalize the Wikipedia article on George Weller (journalist; 1907-2002). Your vigilance in preventing our research being vandalized is much appreciated. Ann Weller Tagge —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ann weller tagge (talk • contribs) 13:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
- This Bot along with VoABot II are probably the two most useful bots that we have here on Wikipedia because they aid in one of the most important tasks here on Wikipedia, and that is keeping the encyclopedia mainspace free from vandalism. Hats off to Cobi for creating the bot :) !, --Mifter (talk) 19:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- thanks for fixing the vandalism on Harry Potter's article --Runesage106 (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- wow you are really all over the place.... Cherokee40 (talk) 01:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
- This Bot's early contributions have been very much valued. Long may it continue! Lradrama 19:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Finally, something else to help out MartinBot since AVbot died. Kwsn(Ni!) 21:46, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Great to again see an active bot beating me to a lot of the silly vandalism I've been dealing with. There goes my edit count! Tony Fox (arf!) 18:51, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yo g, u numba 1 in da hood i give yo props. (Was that good gangsta talk?) (: Cheers, JetLover (talk) 04:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting a page blanking at Steely Dan, which is on my watchlist. :-) --Tkynerd 18:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fantastic support against vandals and mass deletion! Thank you, from a hard-working contributor.BatteryIncluded 11:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- :-) —RuakhTALK 04:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Sweet bot. Very fast at reverting. I need to learn how to program bots....—Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 18:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Great bot, it does it all. The thing that really impresses me is the bot's ability to issue incremental warnings and report to AIV. Very well designed. --Bongwarrior 07:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Cluebot you rock :) Whenever I go to fix vandalism, your already there saving me the trouble! Million_Moments 17:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure if I am posting this in the right spot, but thanks for fixing one of the articles I worked hard on hit by vandalism.FieldMarine 03:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for helping out when I sorta went away into the void (the evils of university) -- Tawker 21:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Cluebot, you suck. You always freaking beat me. :) *Cremepuff222* 01:56, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- It appears you've driven MartinBot into extinction! Lradrama 17:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have been able to beat this lightning quick bot to some reverts which it would consider destructive. But it's still as fast as a jaguar! Mister1nothing 16:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Bloody fantastic! You keep beating me to the reverts! Three cheers to your creator! -HamatoKameko 04:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Incredibly fast!! I have lost over 40 reverts to this bot. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:43, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- Your Bot's real cool but I hate it because it always beats me to the edits!! Keep it up man! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjw212 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Most excellent! Not only do you instantaneously revert the vandalism, but you also place incrementally intensive warnings on the identified vandal's talk page. (I only hope you have the authority to ultimately block the vandal as well :-) ) Can you hear my thunderous applause? Well done! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 18:09, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- .... your bot is too good, I swear. Kwsn(Ni!) 16:40, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- One more. Thank you very much. I've never seen a false positive reverted, and I've looked at many reversions. Well done. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 11:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- ...Dang! I was all excited to revert my first vandalism, and this bot beat me to the punch! Great job on this one! --Ye Olde Luke 02:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Great job of removing vandalism and updating pages--Check It Out. 20:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- This bot has kept my skating page clean and vandalism free for months. Truly fantastic. Thank you! Michael (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- Wow! Vandalism found & fixed as I saw it. Amazingly awesome! --Joe Sewell (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations. The bot you have created performs well its purpose of keeping Wikipedia clean from vandalism attempts (as an e.g.: by reverting an edition by IP 69.253.47.112 and simultaneously warning the anon user about his/her deplorable conduct). Well done! Cheers. --Tekto9 (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- One hell of a bot... great asset to the vandalfighting efforts around here! :) Jmlk17 09:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting vandalism in a flash. Awesome bot you are! PeaceNT (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Best bot on the site! Must have been down a few days ago, because I was actually making it to the edits without finding that they had been reverted before I could click. Brilliant work. RedZionX 15:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Wow! I see vandalism, go to edit and in that instant it's gone. Amazing bot! Congratulations! Blake01 18:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- You make excellent AIV reports, had never to decline one. --Oxymoron83 18:42, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well done, cluebot; the page I vandalized was caught by you and reverted in under 20 seconds. Its that kind of dedication that our main page article(s) need to leave those who visit with a positive sense of the encyclopdia. 129.108.96.106 (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Wiki would be in total shambles without this bot around. Among the most effective bots of all here, and it's fast. Oh so fast. A cup of cheer to Cluebot! ----Jump! Slash! Dash! Ouch! Super Mario SonicBOOM! 17:14, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Too many times have you beat me to reverting vandalism. Happy editing! Nol888(Talk)(Review) 18:12, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- I, for one, welcome our robot overlords as effective in cleaning up vandalism created by the lesser of my species. Thanks Cluebot! Libertycookies (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- I thank the creators of this amazing bot. I have to thank the bot for clearing up vandalism so quickly and I say keep the good work up. Hasseniqbal192 (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Great bot! Not only does it revert page-blank vandalism, but it also reverts minor vandal edits that nobody else catches! - FISDOF9 03:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Turns recent change patrolling into a game of fastest finger. Jon Ace T C 23:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Save some vandals for the rest of us! :-) Seriously, though, keep up the good work. DJBullfish (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for tagging 163.153.156.13. The student was located,had their computer privileges revoked, and wrote an apology on a manual typewriter. NERIC-Security (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you ClueBot, you are so amazing and fast to clean up vandalism. Thank You! PseudoOne (talk) 18:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- HUGGLE pwns you Cluebot but I still got nothin' but love for ya! ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 10:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for reverting useless edits (vandalism). Cheers, Weirdy Talk 07:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I really like your articles. This is my first time using wikipedia.com and i am sorry if i changed your articles. anyway can you write one about rugby? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.237.181 .174 (talk) 04:11, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, dude. You've beat me like three times today to the punch in RVing vandalism. What you deserve is a Wikicookie, awarded above. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 17:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank God for the antivandal bots. 80 Mk.82s on target...I like that image. They're really helping out right now against those IP vandals. They just all had to choose now to hit, didn't they? Sandy of the CSARs (talk) 01:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Mr Bot for unblanking the Soup page! Cls14 (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- How did you program this bot so well? His contributions page is in the ten-thousands and most/all of it is reverting vandalism! Best bot I've seen in a long time.--Phanaj (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, ClueBot, for saving editors the work that they just don't have time for. You are truly an example to the rest of us. --Delta1989 (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reconstructive edits, a champ in the rvv war! Leevanjackson (talk) 02:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- So far, I can't race with you on reverting vandalism. Alexius08 (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've seen ~75 reverts thus far, and not a single false positive yet. Congratulations on a well-trained bot. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 01:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- I love you ClueBot! You've done so much for the community - you're fast, and are very smart with your intelligently designed scoring system by your master Cobi. You seem to have your own personality and spirit and take pride in your work. Congratulations on your ~450,000 reverts and keeping Wikipedia clean and strong. PseudoOne 23:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- UR AWESOME! And I know as i am constantly getting messages from you (i use a network and an account because of the idiots at my school). I see some vandalism and go to edit it, just to find out that it's gone! by you! U ROCK! Matthew (talk) 18:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- If only I had a dime for every time you've beat me to reverting vandalism. I'd be richer than Bill Gates :) --On the other side Contribs|@ 03:45, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- ClueBot is funny. A difference like this one has a subject line referring to possible vandalism? That's funny (but the vandalism being reverted is not)! Thanks for helping reduce the damage vandals do to the project. Aleta Sing 23:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- One of the few bots I find useful. --Bobak (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
- No false positive here :). Thanks for making it. Cristan (talk) 09:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I have challenged your CAPTCHA illiteracy! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!--Editor510 (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2008 (UTC) Just kidding. Oh and whoever runs this amazing guy, ClueBot is in my Wikistory as one of the Wiki Justice League! Thank Dfrg.msc not me!
- This bot is insanely amazing! Never seen it make a mistake, and it has beaten me to a huge number of edits. By far the most active bot that I come across as well. Well done! AvnjayTalk 15:16, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- When I see a bot with a mile-long collection of RickK anti-vandalism barnstars (yes, I'm looking straight at you, BetaCommand Bot), I normally throw up a little bit in my mouth and think to myself, "Ugh, not another one..." This one actually does some nice stuff, though, so it's earned a place in my mental good bots book. flaminglawyerc 17:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- Nice job catching User:Olbrzym's page moves. Seems like ClueBot has got that down as well. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- I love to see random acts of vandalism cleaned up quickly. Too bad I don't have a ClueBot running around my neighborhood in real life. Sbonds (talk) 23:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ahhh, Cluebot, how I love thee... if Cluebot was a living entity, I would be bowing at his/her feet right now. So many times I go to my watchlist and see vandalism, but by the time I get to the page, it's been reverted! I did manage to beat you once or twice, though. :D Thank you. *bows* --Alinnisawest(talk) 20:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Damn you for being offline for 36 hours, and thank you for coming back to our aid. We have a hard time keeping up with the vandals without the valuable close air support a bot like you provides :) TomStar81 (Talk) 03:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- When all the patrollers are sleeping
- And no one is using Huggle
- We can all relax
- Knowing that the wiki is safe
- And under the care of
- Our number 1 bot, ClueBot.
Soxπed93(blag) 06:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, this bot is FAST!.--SuperSecret 18:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- As a new comer, I find the extent of vandalism shocking. But you managed to shake the shocker. This is truly a "superman to the rescue" story! Sillyvalley (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Blazingly fast—I can hardly keep up! :) ~ Troy (talk) 04:05, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am new and have not yet seen ClueBot at work, but just by looking at the code I think you are a great bot! Mogeulb (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Darn you, ClueBot, for being so speedy quick! You're making me lose potential edit count! lol Pip (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I see you now spot and revert even borderline vandalism like this - that's pretty astonishing work from a bot. –Unpopular Opinion (talk) 17:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- ClueBot is lightning fast! I can't tell whether my vandalism to "smirk" was a false positive or not but since it contains the "F" word before the word "you," ClueBot was quick to revert. Keep it up, bot! Megan Woo (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- ClueBot is arguably the most powerful bot currently on Wikipedia, as can be seen from his endless vandalism reversions. Keep up the good work ClueBot!--Almax999 01:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- GAHHHHHHH! At least save some for us! Abce2 (talk) 02:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Abce2
- Let us do the ClueBot dance!Wise dude321 (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, this bot never stops to amaze me. Really impressing--The Evil IP address (talk) 12:57, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow! The fastest bot on earth! --KuRiZu (talk) 08:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Great job, ClueBot! Thanks! Jwkpiano1 (talk) 13:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Really sorry 'bout this. Keep up the great work. EnviroboyTalkCs 22:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good work archiving my talk page, slave. PirateSmackK (talk) 14:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- ClueBot, you've beat me to reverting vandalism too many times. Job well done, and keep up the good work! TheSavageNorwegian 23:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Interfaith article. --Tedlau (talk) 16:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- All hail! Good job to whoever wrote the code for this bot. Nezzadar (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, Cluebot does an amazing job at reverting vandalism, I've only seen it made two false postives out of it's thousands and thousands of edits. Keep up the great work, Cluebot and it's operator. --Andromedabluesphere440 (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- ClueBot, you know vandalism inside and out. Keep up work like this, and Wikipedia will be almost perfect. --Delta1989 (talk) 00:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
- My god, i cant keep up with this thing! it reverts vandalism before i even get a chance to read what what changed! good work good work!
>>>> Posted By Alex Waelde (Leave Me A Messgae) 05:46, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your quick revert of the vandalism that recently appeared on the Little Richard article. I have been spending a lot of time trying to make the article more information and encyclopedic. Your ongoing input / feedback is appreciated. God bless.--Smoovedogg (talk) 23:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- i did an unintentional mistake and the bot corrected it thanks Ilkeston1990 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- THANKS FOR WHAT YOU'VE DONE TO TOM CRUISE'S PAGE, AGAIN THANKS.
- this vandal wanted to see how long it takes to revert, CluBot's answer: under 60 seconds. -- Timberframe (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, ClueBot probably takes between 3-7 seconds. 3 seconds for the revert, and probably another 3 seconds for the warning or AIV report. mechamind90 01:41, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Cluebot, I just want to say: you are awesome. I don't know what we'd do without you. Robofish (talk) 15:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you Cluebot. You have no idea how much I appreciate your work, it really helps me!!! Brambleclawx (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- Nice work, robo. I've beaten you to the punch ONCE in my Wikipedian life (which hasn't been long, but whatev.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starbox (talk • contribs) 22:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- You can warn me of vandalism but please let me off for 1 week, OK? I'm sorry for being a vandal and blank out pages. I promice I will put it righe —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.111.214 (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- You're GREAT! You reverted my vandalism even before the page could load. I promise not to do it again 219.75.81.4 (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Cluebot! Wats poppin'??!? This is your mate Peter McCluskey. You inspire me to get up in the morning.
- Always a good feeling of a clean encyclopedia when ClueBot is around. Good to see recent activity! mechamind90 19:42, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- This Bot Just Keeps on keeping the Wiki Mainspace Clean. Good Job Floul1 (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hands down, the very best vandalism fighting bot ever. It has beaten me loads of times. Lozeldafan (talk) 03:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- You even beat me! Although sometimes I BEAT you :D --Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 01:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- You make me obsolete. man with one red shoe 02:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for making the source code available, documenting it so well, and making it so adaptable to other purposes. It has been very helpful to me in creating my own bots. Tisane (talk) 00:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Even recent changes aren't recent enough! You revert them in under a minute!RussianReversal (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Usually under 3 seconds. -- Cobi(t|c|b) 04:34, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, I have absolutely no idea how this bot caught this vandalism: [3]. Good Job. Quinxorin (talk) 05:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
-
- I bet it's the number of exclamation marks. Few legitimate edits have so many. man with one red shoe 19:30, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- How many times do you have to beat us?? -.- Not that it's a bad thing.Derild4921☼ 22:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- The amount of times cluebot beats me to reverts AND warnings is incredible - I feel redundant :'( - Keep up the good work! EarthCom1000 (talk) 14:17, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- You COULDN'T beat me at reverting User:BrackBoii's edits for Mole and Mental Illness >:) but as with the above you've beaten me many times and it's as though you're programmed to revert just as someone else is >:( well keep it up!!! Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me
- ClueBot, you're awesome!! On countless occasions, I have thought I had reverted vandalism when it turns out you beat me to it! Every wiki should have something like you. You never stop fighting vandals, and I have never seen you mistakenly revert someone. Thank you for helping keep Wikipedia from becoming a chaotic place full of bad-faith editors! --Brandon5485 19:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- THANKSEVERSOMUCH! You quickly deleted some unpleasant nastiness a vandal left at Hudson Utility Coupe. Are you sure your name shouldn't instead be "HEROBot"? Shearonink (talk) 12:21, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
- For being way way too fast
Squish!
...because this could always happen to you...
Contributions
My Contributions
Source
Bot source
Almighty bots. Carbon Monoxide 03:37, 20 October 2007 (UTC)